LIP/IDPASC PhD Student Workshop, Online, 25-27 June 2020
participant survey

1.Please rank from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good) the following aspects of the workshop:
1
2
3
4
5
Topics covered
Total duration of the workshop
General organisation of the workshop
Experience of online workshop
Poster session
Overall experience
2.Please rank from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good) the lectures and talks of the workshop:
1
2
3
4
5
Keynote 1
Keynote 2
keynote 3
keynote 4
keynote 5
Transferable skills
Women in physics talk
Student talks in general
Your own talk (self-evaluation)
3.starting year of your PhD:
4.Expected year of conclusion of your PhD
5.You are...
6.If you are a LIP PhD student, please rank from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good) the following aspects of your PhD:
1
2
3
4
5
Quality of the supervision
Integration in the LIP network (students)
Access to the LIP network (senior researchers)
Quality of the events (schools and workshops) organized by LIP
Frequency of LIP events
General support provided by LIP
7.If you are a IDPASC PhD student, please rank from 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good) the following aspects of your PhD:
1
2
3
4
5
Quality of the supervision
Integration in the IDPASC network (students)
Access to the IDPASC network (senior researchers)
Quality of the events (schools and workshops) organized by IDPASC
Frequency of IDPASC events
General support provided by IDPASC
8.Please suggest themes you find interesting for keynotes lectures in future workshops
9.Other comments and/or suggestions
Progresso atual,
0 de 9 respondidas